Thompson, J. N. The coevolving web of life. Am. Nat. 173, 125–140 (2009).
Thompson, J. N. Mutualistic webs of species. Science 312, 372–373 (2006).
Bascompte, J. & Jordano, P. Plant–animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 567–593 (2007).
Bascompte, J. Disentangling the web of life. Science 325, 416–419 (2009).
Guimarães, P. R. Jr, Pires, M. M., Jordano, P., Bascompte, J. & Thompson, J. N. Indirect effects drive coevolution in mutualistic networks. Nature 550, 511–514 (2017).
Wootton, J. T. The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25, 443–466 (1994).
Strauss, S. Y. Indirect effects in community ecology: their definition, study and importance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 206–210 (1991).
Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (Murray, 1861).
Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon Press, 1930).
Reed, D. H. Relationship between population size and fitness. Conserv. Biol. 19, 563–568 (2005).
Orr, H. A. Fitness and its role in evolutionary genetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 531–539 (2009).
Thompson, J. N. Relentless Evolution (Univ. Chicago Press, 2013).
Bronstein, J. L. Mutualism (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).
Bronstein, J. L. Our current understanding of mutualism. Q. Rev. Biol. 69, 31–51 (1994).
Bronstein, J. L., Dieckmann, U. & Ferrière, R. in Evolutionary Conservation Biology (eds Ferrière, R. et al.) 305–326 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).
Thompson, J. N. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution (Univ. Chicago Press, 2005).
Nuismer, S. L., Jordano, P. & Bascompte, J. Coevolution and the architecture of mutualistic networks. Evolution 67, 338–354 (2013).
Guimarães, P. R. Jr, Jordano, P. & Thompson, J. N. Evolution and coevolution in mutualistic networks. Ecol. Lett. 14, 877–885 (2011).
Kauffman, S. A. & Johnsen, S. Coevolution to the edge of chaos: coupled fitness landscapes, poised states, and coevolutionary avalanches. J. Theor. Biol. 149, 467–505 (1991).
Lande, R. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30, 314–334 (1976).
Santamaría, L. & Rodríguez-Gironés, M. A. Linkage rules for plant–pollinator networks: trait complementarity or exploitation barriers? PLoS Biol. 5, e31 (2007).
Rohr, R. P., Naisbit, R. E., Mazza, C. & Bersier, L.-F. Matching–centrality decomposition and the forecasting of new links in networks. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20152702 (2016).
Peralta, G. et al. Trait matching and phenological overlap increase the spatio-temporal stability and functionality of plant–pollinator interactions. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1107–1116 (2020).
Galen, C. High and dry: drought stress, sex-allocation trade-offs, and selection on flower size in the alpine wildflower Polemonium viscosum (Polemoniaceae). Am. Nat. 156, 72–83 (2000).
Irwin, R. E., Adler, L. S. & Brody, A. K. The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense. Ecology 85, 1503–1511 (2004).
Strauss, S. Y. & Whittall, J. B. in Ecology and Evolution of Flowers (eds Harder, L. D. & Barrett, S. C. H.) 120–138 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006).
Galetti, M. et al. Functional extinction of birds drives rapid evolutionary changes in seed size. Science 340, 1086–1090 (2013).
Yoshimura, J. & Jansen, V. A. A. Evolution and population dynamics in stochastic environments. Res. Popul. Ecol. 38, 165–182 (1996).
Bascompte, J., Possingham, H. & Roughgarden, J. Patchy populations in stochastic environments: critical number of patches for persistence. Am. Nat. 159, 128–137 (2002).
Waser, N. M., Chittka, L., Price, M. V., Williams, N. M. & Ollerton, J. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77, 1043–1060 (1996).
Levins, R. The effect of random variations of different types on population growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 62, 1061–1065 (1969).
Piculell, B. J., Hoeksema, J. D. & Thompson, J. N. Interactions of biotic and abiotic environmental factors in an ectomycorrhizal symbiosis, and the potential for selection mosaics. BMC Biol. 6, 23 (2008).
Batstone, R. T., Peters, M. A. E., Simonsen, A. K., Stinchcombe, J. R. & Frederickson, M. E. Environmental variation impacts trait expression and selection in the legume–rhizobium symbiosis. Am. J. Bot. 107, 195–208 (2020).
Caruso, C. M., Eisen, K. E., Martin, R. A. & Sletvold, N. A meta-analysis of the agents of selection on floral traits. Evolution 73, 4–14 (2019).
Munguía-Rosas, M. A., Ollerton, J., Parra-Tabla, V. & De-Nova, J. A. Meta-analysis of phenotypic selection on flowering phenology suggests that early flowering plants are favoured. Ecol. Lett. 14, 511–521 (2011).
Fricke, E. C. & Svenning, J.-C. Accelerating homogenization of the global plant–frugivore meta-network. Nature 585, 74–78 (2020).
Mackin, C. R., Peña, J. F., Blanco, M. A., Balfour, N. J. & Castellanos, M. C. Rapid evolution of a floral trait following acquisition of novel pollinators. J. Ecol. 109, 2234–2246 (2021).
Stuart, Y. E. et al. Rapid evolution of a native species following invasion by a congener. Science 346, 463–466 (2014).
Valido, A., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, M. C. & Jordano, P. Honeybees disrupt the structure and functionality of plant–pollinator networks. Sci. Rep. 9, 4711 (2019).
Aizen, M. A., Morales, C. L. & Morales, J. M. Invasive mutualists erode native pollination webs. PLoS Biol. 6, e31 (2008).
Traveset, A. & Richardson, D. M. Mutualistic interactions and biological invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 89–113 (2014).
Traveset, A. & Richardson, D. M. Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 208–216 (2006).
Merrel, D. J. The Adaptive Seascape: The Mechanism of Evolution (Univ. Minnesota Press, 1994).
Nuismer, S. Introduction to Coevolutionary Theory (W. H. Freeman, 2017).
Birskis-Barros, I., Freitas, A. V. L. & Guimarães, P. R. Jr. Habitat generalist species constrain the diversity of mimicry rings in heterogeneous habitats. Sci. Rep. 11, 5072 (2021).
Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S. & Shah, V. B. Julia: a fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Rev. 59, 65–98 (2017).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2022).
Cosmo, L. G. Indirect effects shape species fitness in coevolved mutualistic networks (version 1.0.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7945239 (2023).